Picture
Space Invaders—the video game that effectively set the interactive entertainment industry on fire—turned thirty-five this year. 

And thirty-five is a magic number when it comes to copyright termination. Thirty-five is effectively Cinderella’s midnight for hundreds, perhaps thousands, of music, book, film, and video game publishers who believe they have secured the intellectual property rights to another’s work indefinitely.

What may surprise them (and you) is that in 1976 Congress amended Section 203 of the United States Copyright Act, allowing authors of works published after 1978 to reclaim the rights to their creations.  And, in some instances, these rights extend to video games.


 
 
Picture

If you’ve worked in the videogame industry for any length of time, you’ve undoubtedly come across legal language similar to this:

The Game and all other Intellectual Property that the Developer creates in connection with the services provided under this Agreement shall be considered work made for hire, and shall therefore be the sole and exclusive property of Publisher from the time of creation.



 
 
Picture

The decision in ReDigi v. Capitol Records probably means that you can't resell your digitally downloaded video games—but for reasons that may surprise you. 


 
 
Picture
Right of Publicity in Video games

Earlier this year I discussed Keller v. EA, a right of publicity case [1] that was appealed by EA to the Ninth Circuit Court, primarily on the basis of a First Amendment Right to use NCAA player likenesses in their college football games. The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion yesterday, holding against EA, in what may prove to be a fatal and perhaps final blow in EA's self-proclaimed right to use sports figure likenesses in a game without express permission.


 
 
Picture

 How Do You Make Sure Your Idea is Safe?



A few days ago, I posted a message on Linked In, offering to answer a few legal questions posted by app and video game developers. I've been nearly overwhelmed with questions!  So here's the answer to the first from a developer who asked:



 
 
Picture
In the ever-changing world of high tech intellectual property law, the word “Platform” has special meaning. More often than not, you’ll find it in software licensing agreements to specify, and more importantly to limit, the computing systems that a particular piece of code—whether a video game or accounting program or iPhone App—are authorized to run on. But these days, Platform can mean just about anything. 


 
 
Picture
Creating a bulletproof corporate shield.
A recent Game Developer’s Conference study found, unsurprisingly, that 53% of the attendees they polled identified themselves as indie developers, with nearly the same percentage saying that they work in companies with ten or fewer people. [1]

With the explosion of mobile and casual gaming, this has created exciting times for entrepreneurs, but the reality is that most independent game developers lack the legal expertise necessary to navigate this new publishing world. Many will make it through unscathed. Others, unfortunately, won’t be as lucky.


 
 
Picture
Used by permission. Shutterstock.
Until recently, video game developers generally focused on the creative and technical aspects of developing an interactive game, while their publishers handled issues of sales, marketing, and legal. But in the world of direct-to-consumer digital distribution, indies do both. They build apps, and then manage sales and marketing through Apple’s App Store and Google Play, and inside environments like Steam and Xbox Live. While all this has created significant opportunities for thousands of emerging game developers, few realize the legal hazards they undertake when launching a game—risks that their former publishing partners often assumed on their behalf. 

In this two-part series (find part two here), we’ll discuss what I consider the top six legal mistakes app developers make when launching a new game in the digital marketplace.


 
 
The First Amendment states, in part, that Congress shall make no law…. abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.

 
 
Picture
Number 3
Silicon Knights v. Epic Games

Earlier we posted West and Zampella v. Activision and Gate Five LLC v. Beyoncé Knowles-Carter, the first two of what we consider the 5 Most Influential Video Game Lawsuits of 2012.

The discussion continues here with Silicon Knights v. Epic Games, which, so far, has ended badly for Silicon Knights.